



Raising children to have a good relationship with food and their bodies is one of the best ways to promote good self-esteem and protect them from developing disordered eating.
But this can be tricky if you struggle with eating and body image yourself. So, what should you aim for, and what should you avoid?
Disordered eating describes a range of problematic behaviours and attitudes towards eating, weight and the body. It can include dieting, cutting out foods or food groups, skipping meals, fasting, binge eating or exercising excessively.
Not all disordered eating will lead to an eating disorder. But eating disorders are usually preceded by disordered eating, particularly dieting.
Concerns about eating and body image are common and can begin from a young age. Globally, 22% of children and adolescents engage in disordered eating, with higher rates among girls.
Lots of factors influence how kids feel about food and their body, including expectations from media, self-esteem and family attitudes.
Given children observe and model how parents talk about their bodies and food, it can help to model positive or neutral language and eating behaviours. Here are some tips.
1. Framing food as ‘good’ or ‘bad’
Don’t talk about dieting, weight loss and “good” or “bad” food, as this can make food a moral issue. For example, saying you’ve “been bad today” for eating something sweet, or “good” for sticking to your diet, can perpetuate shame and guilt around eating.
Instead, aim to talk about how different foods nourish our bodies, or how some foods taste good and are satisfying.
2. Commenting on other people’s bodies
Talking about other people’s bodies, weight or eating habits – whether they’re family, strangers or celebrities – can teach kids to compare and judge themselves against other people.
If your child does comment on another person’s body, you could respond by saying something like, “everyone is different. Some people are taller, shorter, have larger bodies, smaller bodies, and different skin colours”. Celebrating people of all shapes and body sizes can teach kids that weight isn’t a measure of worthiness.
3. Giving appearance-based compliments
When praising your child, focus on things that aren’t related to weight, appearance or eating. For example, “it was generous how you shared your toys today” or “I saw how hard you worked on your homework”.
And when you’re talking to a child you don’t know, an appearance-based compliment (“you look pretty”) may often come to mind first. Instead you might want to comment on their energy, humour, style or creativity (“I love your sense of style” or “you have such good energy”).
4. Criticising your own body
Being a positive body image role model for your children is important. Research shows hearing others criticise their own bodies can lead kids to engage in more negative self-talk about their own bodies. Changing the conversation from appearance to strength, health or function can help (“these arms let me hug you” or “my legs are strong for walking”).
1. Trust your kid knows how much they need
Although it can be difficult, try to trust that your child will eat as much or as little as they need. Children can mostly self-regulate to meet their bodies’ needs. So teaching your child to listen to their body’s physical cues – such as hunger and fullness – can help them build a positive relationship with food.
Parents often want their kids to eat all the food on their plate before they leave the table. But this can lead to struggles over food and teach children to ignore physical cues.
You can still make sure your kids sit until the mealtime is finished, without making it about eating itself.
It can also be reassuring to look at a child’s whole week of eating, rather than focusing on any particular meal or day (which can fluctuate in amount and nutritional value).
2. Find your own pleasure in eating
Eating a variety of foods yourself, and enjoying and appreciating food can provide important role modelling to your child.
If you struggle with your own body image or eating, this might require unlearning diet rules about when, what, and how much to eat. If you find this challenging it could be beneficial to seek professional help.
3. Aim for neutral
For many people, body positivity (“I feel good about my body”) might not be possible, so you might like to aim for body neutrality. This mindset means accepting and respecting your body just how it is.
Body neutrality can involve reframing thoughts and feelings about your body. For example, “I have put on weight” may become “my body is allowed to change”.
Understanding the signs of disordered eating can also be useful to recognise in your children. If you notice drastic changes in your child’s eating or weight, or have other concerns, it could be worth starting a conversation.
Talking about food and bodies can start at any age. Encourage open conversations and invite your child to share their feelings and thoughts about their body and weight.
If your child makes a negative comment about their body, eating, or weight, try to understand what might be driving it and listen without judgement.
And if you’re concerned, reaching out for support can be a crucial step for improving your kids physical and mental health. This could include your kids’ regular GP, or health professionals such as dietitians or psychologists who specialise in eating disorders.
Butterfly Foundation is Australia’s national eating disorder charity and helpline. For free and confidential support between 8am and midnight you can call 1800 334 673, chat online or send an email.![]()
Courtney P. McLean, Research Fellow, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University and Chelsea Arnold, Clinical Psychologist and Research Fellow (Lead Clinician), Monash University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


In a high-end fashion store or luxury car showroom, the term “vegan leather” sends a strong message of quality. For many shoppers, it promises the look and feel of real leather without using animal skins. As brands move away from animal leather, “vegan” has come to suggest something that is both kinder to animals and better for the planet.
However, the reality is more complicated. While these materials remove animal products, they often replace one environmental problem with another. Vegan leather is not one material, but a broad label that covers everything from plastic coatings to plant-based surfaces, which is why regulators are starting to question vague green claims.
The appeal of leather alternatives is easy to understand. Concerns about animal welfare, climate change and deforestation have pushed shoppers and brands towards options that seem more responsible.
As a result, “vegan leather” is often seen as the better choice – even though how long it lasts, and where it ends up, is rarely questioned.
For decades, these materials were known as “pleather” or vinyl. Today, better finishes have turned thin plastic films into convincing leather lookalikes.
Most vegan leathers consist of polyurethane (PU) or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) coatings bonded to fabric backings. They are waterproof and easy to emboss, but they are also petroleum-derived plastics.
When the surface of a PU‑coated bag cracks or peels, the damage is more than cosmetic. As the coating breaks down, it sheds microplastics into the environment.
In response to concerns about plastic, new fake leather materials have been developed from pineapples, mushrooms, apples, grapes and even cacti. These bio-based options are often sold as the sustainable answer.
However, using a plant does not automatically make a product better for the environment.
The issue lies in how these materials are made. A “pineapple leather” shoe may be praised for its plant fibres, but those fibres are usually held together with plastic resins to make the material durable.
The result is a mixed material that cannot be recycled in Australia, even though marketing often focuses on the plant ingredient and hides the plastic underneath.
A key challenge with many vegan leather alternatives is strength. Raw plant fibres are too weak to handle the repeated wear and pressure faced by shoes, bags and car seats. To improve performance, manufacturers layer plant materials onto plastic binders or polyester backings.
Even then, many of these materials break down sooner than real leather and cannot be properly repaired. Traditional leather can be conditioned, patched and allowed to age over time, but plant-based alternatives tend to fail once the surface coating cracks or peels.
A mushroom- or apple-based bag also cannot be composted because of the plastic beneath its surface, meaning it reaches disposal much sooner. Some plant-based vegan leather products have reported lifespans of as little as two years.
This points to a broader issue. In a circular economy that prioritises reuse, repair and material recovery, sustainability is about keeping products in use and at their highest value for as long as possible.
The problems hidden by elusive marketing labels are becoming harder to ignore. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has made it clear broad labels such as “sustainable” or “eco-friendly” must be backed up with evidence.
If brands use the word “vegan” to suggest lower environmental impact, they must be able to prove that claim by looking at the product’s full life cycle.
At the same time, the Productivity Commission’s 2026 inquiry into the circular economy highlights Australia’s growing problem with products that cannot be recycled. As product stewardship schemes expand, durability, recyclability and what happens to a product at the end of its life will matter as much as animal welfare.
None of this means animal leather comes without environmental or chemical costs. These include methane emissions from livestock and the toxic chemicals used in tanning. For many consumers, avoiding animal-derived materials is still an important ethical choice.
However, “vegan” and “sustainable” are not the same thing. One describes what has been left out of a product, while the other describes how that product performs over its entire life. Treating the two as interchangeable can replace meaningful progress with reassuring labels.
The takeaway is a call for material honesty. Sustainability can’t be reduced to a single word or ingredient. It’s measured by how long a product stays useful before it needs to be thrown away. A bag that avoids animal materials but breaks down within a few years simply creates waste sooner.
If vegan alternatives are going to be sustainable, they must be designed to last. Sustainability is measured in years of use, not words on a tag.![]()
Caroline Swee Lin Tan, Associate Professor in Fashion Entrepreneurship, RMIT University and Saniyat Islam, Associate Professor, Fashion and Textiles, RMIT University
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.






.jpg)